We really have no idea and awareness of defects, consequences, damage and phenomena producing them caused by the current consideration of the model in the computer science and industry field. This is also an explanation why there is a hole of incomprehension between business and technologies people. We don’t use the same language to speak about the same things. Even between all technologies people there is incomprehension. We know that since a long time. But what are the reasons? Because langage is business of signs and symbols.

imperfection does not prevent working, it costs only expensive.

In this content, we analyze the reasons about linguistic shift to specify the same things and consequences. Among these reasons, when we conceptualize, specify something between several participants, the principal default is in the different interpretations and usage about signs, codes and symbols to represent the same thing. The multitude of meaning (representem, what act as sign, symbol to interpret a thing) about one thing (referent: object(s), system(s), element(s), reality, etc.) implies the multitude of meta-meta-models are proposed to specify systems according stakeholder and discipline. Already for all of us, it is difficult to form correctly an simple and exact image of the world. Then between all participants, form system, it’s still more difficult. All bodies and fields of sciences and industries are impacted.

In particular to specify systems between business and technologies people where the signs and symbols are large to express the same thing.

Signes and symbols are representems representing our perception (interpreting) of elements of world. It’s the first level risk to degrade a same simple signification. After we interpret the signes to integrate or reject concept represented by the signs and symbols. The principal default is the diversity of representems to signify the same natural element is the start of confusions, ambiguity, misunderstanding, duplication, proliferation and dispersion of meant.

Even diversity is interesting for wealth of our culture, in several contexts such as enterprise and undertake, obstacles, constraints and risks are very big and in lot of circonstances, unacceptable. Because duplication, proliferation, dispersion of models from the same system is commun, in enterprise, this default is very daily.

In the System and Technologie of Information and Communication (STIC) discipline, these defaults are very commun and induce severals other defaults.

To correct this and change radically perspectives and perceptions, we have to understand the true nature of forms and interactions between specifications, models, programming langage, compilers, interpreters, instances, resources and knowledge to reconsider the simplicity of technologization process.

To ensure quality in agility, we have to understand reasons about this problem.

To helps us, we are a discipline to understand and resolve some defaults: The semiotic. Semiotic for informatique propose to manage knowledge with control of representations of elements to make simple models in the spécifications, development and knowledge cycle in the informatique contexte to make a SI for business SI.

The semiotic allows to understand reasons and to correct defaults. Semiotic impacts on the enterprise and stakeholders visions is very important and can change culture, approach and knowledge. It directly acts on the computerization process between all stakeholders to make coherent models to produce and inform about reality of operational systems in a enterprise dynamic.

This content site tries to propose analyzes and suggestions what are defaults in the interpretation of signes to conceptualize and delivery STIC according enterprise requirements.

The first is to understand and distinguish specifications, models, instances resources dynamic to conceptualize and deliver the business science, systems and technologies of Information and communication (STIC, business stic, businessstic).

We suggest and propose to make a SI about business SI for enterprise.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s